Life on Venus
Don’t expect
exotic green men, Venus surface is poundingly hot and with a suffocating
atmosphere. What is speculated upon is some kind of very primitive life such as
bacteria high in the Venusian
atmosphere. High could mean 50 miles high. The evidence isn’t very strong but
it is fascinating. Essentially evidence has been found for phosphine gas high
in the atmosphere. The evidence isn’t unambiguous but the fascination is that
there is no known mechanism which makes the gas other than life.
The scientists
have identified the gas by two separate telescopes although the identification
is rather limited in other ways. Alternatives for phosphine production have
been considered and eliminated. This means that if the production is by some
non living process then that process is unknown at the present.
In a sense we
have been here before. Many years ago life was pronounced present on Mars based
on microscopic examination of meteorites
thrown up by Mars and found on Earth. This examination thought that they
saw fossils of ancient bacteria. Although widely publicised at the time this is
now thought not to be fossils.
There is a
fascination in the search for extra terrestrial intelligence ( SETI ). There
are two main threads to this. One is focused on possibilities in the solar
system and the other on a search for unusual signals ( by radio ) from the
universe at large.
The search in
the solar system is based around what sort of conditions might enable life to begin.
The expectation that anything will be very elementary such as bacteria or very
simple lichen type plants. The search is directed by looking for environments
where earth like species may exist. One important consideration is the presence
of liquid water. It is thought to be difficult for life to exist in frozen
water. There is a speculation that life may have begun on Mars in the distant
past when conditions were probably more favourable but has probably either died
out or retreated to ecological niches. Almost certainly Mars had abundant
liquid water millions of years ago as evidence of ancient seas have been found.
Alternative
possibilities in the solar system are suggested in the moons of Saturn and
Jupiter. At least one is thought to have an existing sea but one covered in
ice. In general these moons are too cold although some may have internal
heating judged by the evidence of volcano like activity.
The search for
life elsewhere in the universe is being conducted by the aptly named SETI
project. SETI is Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence. Essentially the driving force has been the
speculation that there are so many suns which have so planets that
statistically some must have generated intelligent life. The project has been
analysing radio reception from radio telescopes. Any anomaly is eagerly pounced
upon by the community but so far an alternative explanation has been found.
There are good
physical reasons why this is highly likely to be a futile exercise. Nothing can
travel faster than the speed of light( according to known physics ). Radio
waves travel at this speed but the universe is so large that radio signals take
many years. The nearest stars are over 4 light years away so that even
travelling at light speed radio waves take over 4 years to reach us. In general
stars are much further away and other galaxies ( star clusters ) even further.
A message from say 100 light years away will do nothing to establish
communication but only let us know it exists. Just image a conversation that takes
200 years between comment and answer Looking at things another way all radio
type signals from earth will have only travelled about a 100 light years from
earth. Even if the other intelligence is listening out the bubble of earth
signals will only be about 100 light years across.
Swearing
I’m in favour
of swearing but not in front of others. An effective bout of swearing relieves
the feeling of distress or disappointment. Although futile in its effect it
succeeds in a temporary relief of ones psyche.
I recall our
English teacher at secondary school lecturing us on swearing which he
attributed to a lack of vocabulary. This is not a thesis with which I agree. He
pointed out that many ( what would now be considered mild ) swear word s were
connected with religion. To express an oath of “god’s blood” now reduced to
bloody was deeply shocking even sacrilegious in an age where faith was nearly
universal. A range of other swearing such as damnation has similar origin and
effect.
More recently
the so called 4 letter words have become distressingly common even in common
discourse. By their very use the shock value is blunted. I hope we have reached
a time when even a comedian uttering f..k
no longer arouses a laugh.
For myself I
find I swear like my father. He would never use 4 letter words but b….r was
relatively common . I find now that I’m rather inhibited in using 4 letter
words but like my father I regard b….r as relatively mild. I note that as
religious exclamations are now mild in this age where faith is not so
significant that most modern swearing has sexual connotation.
It seems that
maybe Americans are somewhat unusual in that refences to one’s mother are
somehow deeply disturbing thus s-o-b and the litany of related swear words
scarcely ever occurs in England while if literature is to be believed these are
common in the USA
I remember
being quite shocked early in my career when a ( lady ) technician I was working
with remarked quite casually that I swore a lot. The task was a frustrating one
but I regarded my swearing as quite mild and without obscenities. If I had
imagined that the technician found it shocking I would ( I hope ) refrained. I
think she was referring to my use of b….r which perhaps was unusual. The lady
concerned was not protesting but voicing her observation.. I hope I was more careful
in future.