The whole issue
around class is fraught and I’m very pleased that it has become much less
important over my lifetime. Looking back I can see that in the village where I
grew up was almost feudal. The class
distinctions were more finely graded than working and middle. At the top was
the local landowner who descended from lofty heights each year to give us
children at the village school a present every Christmas. This was done via the
teachers as the landowner only rarely appeared at ceremonial occasions. The
only one I recall was a tree planting.
Next in the hierarchy
was a farmer who owned his farm and land who stood above the tenant farmers
who, while high status,,rented their farms from the landowner. Then in the
village were the professionals respected because of their position, the
teachers and the parson.
A few skilled
workers came next, the blacksmith for example. On the farms the skilled and
responsible were rated alongside, such as the cowman. I suppose also the tenant
publican.
At the bottom
were those who sold just their labour. In my village these were agricultural
labourers and miners. Curiously even these had a ranking with those who were respectable and those who were not. Respectable meant no debts, moderate drinking, family men while the disrespectable were the debt ridden heavy drinkers. The issue of debt was central, my parents had a horror of debt because that it might drag them down. I accepted all of this as just the way of the world.
labourers and miners. Curiously even these had a ranking with those who were respectable and those who were not. Respectable meant no debts, moderate drinking, family men while the disrespectable were the debt ridden heavy drinkers. The issue of debt was central, my parents had a horror of debt because that it might drag them down. I accepted all of this as just the way of the world.
When I went to
grammar school it marked a boundary. I was at once respected by my elders and
reviled by my contemporaries. At school there was no great class consciousness.
My school group was predominantly middle class and urban. There were a handful
from working class families and few from villages. Oddly the only snobbery I
encountered came later from the headmaster who was acutely class aware at the
sixth form level.
Class was
rarely an issue at university. The students from the UK were mainly from
working or lower middle class backgrounds at this ex College of Technology. The
subjects offered which were mainly engineering at the time did not to attract
those planning more recreational arts
and humanities subjects or the traditional professions. The big difference was
with the non UK students who were about a 25% of the total. Almost by
definition they came from families who
could afford to send them to study in the UK and tended to be high status in
their own country. One of my friends was the son of a Pakistani diplomat. I
remember being quite shocked when another friend from Kashmir talked casually
of buying a car.
When I started
work for Unilever I found I was catapulted into a different class. For example
as a graduate I had automatic access to the senior dining room. At that time (
in the mid sixties ) the company was extremely hierarchical. I almost feared I
was expected to make use of all the management privileges. It came as something
of a relief when I realised that the scientific staff, particularly the younger
ones, didn’t greatly care, using whatever they found convenient. If anything
there was a qualification ranking and as a mere graduate I was low against all
those with doctorates and post doc study. This did stimulate me to work for a
years release to study for a Masters degree.
There was a
fine grained hierarchy within the laboratories. The technical assistants always
wore lab coats while the scientists didn’t unless they ( rarely ) were doing
some job requiring protection from splashes. Among the scientists the more
senior had single offices, the less senior shared offices, and junior had to
make do with a desk space in a laboratory.
I spent 15
years with Unilever and saw in the later 70’s a big change in attitude. It
became company policy to abandon the old paternalist ways and with them adopt a
different approach where differentials were much more on salary and much less
on privileges.
Working in
smaller companies the environment was much less class orientated. Even in
Castrol the structure was far less rigid although remnants remained. The senior
dining room with waitress service was only removed when it became physically
possible to have a large self service dining room catering to everyone.
The Castrol
headquarters while nominally open plan offices, actually evolved into small
groups separating themselves by arrangement of cupboards, cabinets etc. At least
here the separation was by function rather than hierarchy.
This flattening
has become more widespread in society as a whole although class awareness is
very persistent. A village friend who is completely middle class by home
ownership, previous management jobs and his own business insists he is working
class. I was brought up in the working class but I recognise changes have
occurred. The one change I have tried to make deliberately ( and failed ) is in
my speech. I have a slight West Midlands accent, not noticeable in that area
but anywhere else in the country immediately identifiable. While regional
accents have become totally acceptable, even de rigeur to some, I don’t like
the “ Brummie” association.
No comments:
Post a Comment